<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housekeeping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billrini.com/2004/08/03/housekeeping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/08/03/housekeeping/</link>
	<description>Blogging About Poker Since 2546</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/08/03/housekeeping/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=114#comment-137</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WordPress&lt;/a&gt; is pretty darn good. It does what it says, and has only a few fleas. They have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.wordpress.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;development wiki&lt;/a&gt;, a plug-in architecture that I like, (i&#039;ve added some nifty plugins to my install, which is painless and powerful), and it&#039;s done very well for me on my &lt;a href=&quot;http://sandiegoblog.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;San Diego Blog&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s not perfect, but in terms of php/mysql solutions, I think it&#039;s best of breed and right on for a blog. If I had more general needs in terms of a CMS, I&#039;d be looking at &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;drupal&lt;/a&gt; or textpattern -- I&#039;m testing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.textpattern.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Textpattern&lt;/a&gt; out now, and it&#039;s okay, but not mindblowing.

I&#039;m curious to see how well things work out if you go to WordPress.

Also, MT has a number of plugins to handle comment spam, in particular ones to disable comments on older posts (which is where I have seen periodic attacks in WordPress). WP has a feature to disable comments automatically if they meet certain criteria (such as number of outbound links).

Eh, anyway. Good luck Bill, hopefully my post won&#039;t get flagged as a spam since I included all these links. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wordpress.org/" rel="nofollow">WordPress</a> is pretty darn good. It does what it says, and has only a few fleas. They have a <a href="http://wiki.wordpress.org/" rel="nofollow">development wiki</a>, a plug-in architecture that I like, (i&#8217;ve added some nifty plugins to my install, which is painless and powerful), and it&#8217;s done very well for me on my <a href="http://sandiegoblog.com/" rel="nofollow">San Diego Blog</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not perfect, but in terms of php/mysql solutions, I think it&#8217;s best of breed and right on for a blog. If I had more general needs in terms of a CMS, I&#8217;d be looking at <a href="http://drupal.org/" rel="nofollow">drupal</a> or textpattern &#8212; I&#8217;m testing <a href="http://www.textpattern.com/" rel="nofollow">Textpattern</a> out now, and it&#8217;s okay, but not mindblowing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to see how well things work out if you go to WordPress.</p>
<p>Also, MT has a number of plugins to handle comment spam, in particular ones to disable comments on older posts (which is where I have seen periodic attacks in WordPress). WP has a feature to disable comments automatically if they meet certain criteria (such as number of outbound links).</p>
<p>Eh, anyway. Good luck Bill, hopefully my post won&#8217;t get flagged as a spam since I included all these links. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rini</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/08/03/housekeeping/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=114#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Joe, long time no hear.  Hope things are well in San Diego.

I hear ya on WordPress.  A lot of people seem to like it.  If you don&#039;t have to do a lot of customization it&#039;s probably fine.  One of the things that concerned me when I first took a look at it though was that on their dev boards they were talking about 2 or 3 major changes to the plugin API.  Not 2 or 3 changes in one release but 2 or 3 changes coming over several releases.  In many cases people would have to re-write their plugins several times in order to keep up.

All in all, I think they have an ok product but I&#039;m not sure I want to throw my hat in the ring with them just yet.  To be honest, I&#039;m really interested in writing my own.  I think some of the stuff MT does is far superior to WP and WP has some features I wish MT would add.  That and the fact there are some things I think neither of them actually got right and I&#039;m sort of leaning towards finding a few weeks in my schedule to crank something out.  Who knows, one day it might happen :-)

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, long time no hear.  Hope things are well in San Diego.</p>
<p>I hear ya on WordPress.  A lot of people seem to like it.  If you don&#8217;t have to do a lot of customization it&#8217;s probably fine.  One of the things that concerned me when I first took a look at it though was that on their dev boards they were talking about 2 or 3 major changes to the plugin API.  Not 2 or 3 changes in one release but 2 or 3 changes coming over several releases.  In many cases people would have to re-write their plugins several times in order to keep up.</p>
<p>All in all, I think they have an ok product but I&#8217;m not sure I want to throw my hat in the ring with them just yet.  To be honest, I&#8217;m really interested in writing my own.  I think some of the stuff MT does is far superior to WP and WP has some features I wish MT would add.  That and the fact there are some things I think neither of them actually got right and I&#8217;m sort of leaning towards finding a few weeks in my schedule to crank something out.  Who knows, one day it might happen :-)</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/08/03/housekeeping/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=114#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Cool. I think the way that the base has expanded will get them to reconsider &quot;breaking&quot; lots of existing installations as far as an API/plugin architecture.

At least, I think.

But I&#039;d be interested to hear what kind of things you&#039;d want to do with WordPress you think you can&#039;t -- I&#039;ve found that when I think of a feature I want -- I just google on the wordpress.org site and *somebody* has done something along those lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. I think the way that the base has expanded will get them to reconsider &#8220;breaking&#8221; lots of existing installations as far as an API/plugin architecture.</p>
<p>At least, I think.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;d be interested to hear what kind of things you&#8217;d want to do with WordPress you think you can&#8217;t &#8212; I&#8217;ve found that when I think of a feature I want &#8212; I just google on the wordpress.org site and *somebody* has done something along those lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

