<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proof That Online Poker Is Rigged!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/</link>
	<description>The Bill Rini Poker Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sorrelltop</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-6492</link>
		<dc:creator>sorrelltop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-6492</guid>
		<description>This is great! LOL

I firmly believe online poker rooms ARE NOT rigged. There have been some cases of outright cheating, but those cases had nothing to do with the randomness of the cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great! LOL</p>
<p>I firmly believe online poker rooms ARE NOT rigged. There have been some cases of outright cheating, but those cases had nothing to do with the randomness of the cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupid Peon</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-6458</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupid Peon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-6458</guid>
		<description>Tell me, how do millions of hands compare to 40 billion hands?  Flaw(s), whether intentional or not, could easily be disguised.   It would be quite easy for them to provide a comparatively small sample which, when analyzed, resembled a normal distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me, how do millions of hands compare to 40 billion hands?  Flaw(s), whether intentional or not, could easily be disguised.   It would be quite easy for them to provide a comparatively small sample which, when analyzed, resembled a normal distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-6359</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-6359</guid>
		<description>I was dealt AA pocket cards 3 hands in a row and lost every hand to bullshit calls from people who had cards like 3, 8 off suit.  Not rigged, my ass.  The odds on that happening legitimately would have to be at least in the billions, probably higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was dealt AA pocket cards 3 hands in a row and lost every hand to bullshit calls from people who had cards like 3, 8 off suit.  Not rigged, my ass.  The odds on that happening legitimately would have to be at least in the billions, probably higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-6066</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-6066</guid>
		<description>The sarcasm is funny but online poker sites are rigged. Play live or don&#039;t play!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sarcasm is funny but online poker sites are rigged. Play live or don&#8217;t play!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: villamax</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-5797</link>
		<dc:creator>villamax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-5797</guid>
		<description>You can all argue till your balls fall off but none of you will ever change my mind about the FACT that ALL poker sites are 100% definitely rigged,JOKERSTARS  and BLUE SQUARE being the worst rip off fucking thieves. ALL online pokersites should be closed down. Live poker is the only way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can all argue till your balls fall off but none of you will ever change my mind about the FACT that ALL poker sites are 100% definitely rigged,JOKERSTARS  and BLUE SQUARE being the worst rip off fucking thieves. ALL online pokersites should be closed down. Live poker is the only way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koen</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-5718</link>
		<dc:creator>Koen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-5718</guid>
		<description>The Part of the AA I mentioned earlier was meant ironic. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s more than 50% of the time AA hold up, in fact my AA hold up 66,67% of the time (last 10.000 hands), but that&#039;s not the point. Sadly you just ignored the rest of my post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Part of the AA I mentioned earlier was meant ironic. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s more than 50% of the time AA hold up, in fact my AA hold up 66,67% of the time (last 10.000 hands), but that&#8217;s not the point. Sadly you just ignored the rest of my post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rini</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-5637</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-5637</guid>
		<description>Hey Koen,

Send me your PT stats.  I don&#039;t believe your results.

Your accusation proves my point.  Because others have taken samples from millions of hands and the one thing everyone seems to agree upon is that starting hands hold up as statistically expected.  Now, others might tell tales of action flops and such but the cold hard truth is that starting hands hold up as expected.  So your claim is a fabrication or you are talking about a sample size too small to be statistically relevant.  

So offer up your PT stats or we have to conclude your statement isn&#039;t accurate.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Koen,</p>
<p>Send me your PT stats.  I don&#8217;t believe your results.</p>
<p>Your accusation proves my point.  Because others have taken samples from millions of hands and the one thing everyone seems to agree upon is that starting hands hold up as statistically expected.  Now, others might tell tales of action flops and such but the cold hard truth is that starting hands hold up as expected.  So your claim is a fabrication or you are talking about a sample size too small to be statistically relevant.  </p>
<p>So offer up your PT stats or we have to conclude your statement isn&#8217;t accurate.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-5636</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-5636</guid>
		<description>My AA stand up online over 87% (the last 25,000 hands).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My AA stand up online over 87% (the last 25,000 hands).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koen</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-5635</link>
		<dc:creator>Koen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-5635</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

Nice one Joe! 
And by the way Bill, the debate IS endless.
But facts are facts. 

Fact is that poker sites (like so many other things in life) are made for profit. Not for people having fun, not for great poker players to make money with their skills, or wannabepro&#039;s or rookies to get broke on. They only make it to get as many people hooked to the feeling of winning so when they loose they will come back for more...losses... And how to do that best? Keeping things really random and honest how it should, or making the game more intens, so more action will come from any direction of the tables? Seriously, the amount of straights, flushes, full houses etc IS really much higher then in real life games. And it IS NO coincidence. 
It is also no coincidence why broadcasted poker only shows those exciting hands, but almost never the more boring parts. While that is an imported part of the game, patience and aggression. Sure big laydowns and lucky draws too, but that doesn&#039;t happen too frequent. 
I even know some guys who know a few gaps in the system and exploiting them. 

Fact also is that there are no clear laws or independent companies or services who can keep things clean. So if some (probably all) of theses sites are in fact rigged somehow, we will never know for sure!! AND no-one can prove it! And the funniest part (which comes in handy for the online pokersites) no-once can prove the opposite!  As I said, the debate is endless...

Casino&#039;s (not online) are not rigged and will do anything to keep cheaters out. They make enough money with fees and rake, and drinks, slots, roulette, etc etc. But for the online casino&#039;s it is my believe that it is not enough profit. Especially for the small ones. The biggest ones have a reputation to keep up and allready making enough money so they want to keep things just as good as possible. 

Oh, one last thing... 
[quote]
See, the problem is that nobody of any real significance or trust has asked. You claim that requests for 10 million hands have been denied but who was asking? What was in it for the poker room to spend a man-month of effort to deliver scrubbed (removing personal information) data? Would the requester be able to get national/world headlines with his findings?
[/quote] 
The CAN spend millions of $$ for advertising campaigns but they CAN NOT deliver prove that their software is 100% legit and save??? Putting for once and forever an end at the accusations and discussions whether or not theirs something funny going on... What&#039;s that about??? Can you explain that to me please??? 

Then their are those cheaters...Collusion for one, but also guys who have databases recording every player habbits, strengths en weaknesses. Is it cheating? I don&#039;t believe it says so in the policy of the sites, but to me it is. 

Actually, I can go on for a while, unfortunately. But for me it is clear. I still play online though, but only because it&#039;s the only place I can play whenever I want since their are not many games in my area. I&#039;ve made some strict rules for myself for playing online though so I won&#039;t loose too much money. And you know, It&#039;s still nice seeing that your AA stays alive about 50% of the time, online that is...

Koen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>Nice one Joe!<br />
And by the way Bill, the debate IS endless.<br />
But facts are facts. </p>
<p>Fact is that poker sites (like so many other things in life) are made for profit. Not for people having fun, not for great poker players to make money with their skills, or wannabepro&#8217;s or rookies to get broke on. They only make it to get as many people hooked to the feeling of winning so when they loose they will come back for more&#8230;losses&#8230; And how to do that best? Keeping things really random and honest how it should, or making the game more intens, so more action will come from any direction of the tables? Seriously, the amount of straights, flushes, full houses etc IS really much higher then in real life games. And it IS NO coincidence.<br />
It is also no coincidence why broadcasted poker only shows those exciting hands, but almost never the more boring parts. While that is an imported part of the game, patience and aggression. Sure big laydowns and lucky draws too, but that doesn&#8217;t happen too frequent.<br />
I even know some guys who know a few gaps in the system and exploiting them. </p>
<p>Fact also is that there are no clear laws or independent companies or services who can keep things clean. So if some (probably all) of theses sites are in fact rigged somehow, we will never know for sure!! AND no-one can prove it! And the funniest part (which comes in handy for the online pokersites) no-once can prove the opposite!  As I said, the debate is endless&#8230;</p>
<p>Casino&#8217;s (not online) are not rigged and will do anything to keep cheaters out. They make enough money with fees and rake, and drinks, slots, roulette, etc etc. But for the online casino&#8217;s it is my believe that it is not enough profit. Especially for the small ones. The biggest ones have a reputation to keep up and allready making enough money so they want to keep things just as good as possible. </p>
<p>Oh, one last thing&#8230;<br />
[quote]<br />
See, the problem is that nobody of any real significance or trust has asked. You claim that requests for 10 million hands have been denied but who was asking? What was in it for the poker room to spend a man-month of effort to deliver scrubbed (removing personal information) data? Would the requester be able to get national/world headlines with his findings?<br />
[/quote]<br />
The CAN spend millions of $$ for advertising campaigns but they CAN NOT deliver prove that their software is 100% legit and save??? Putting for once and forever an end at the accusations and discussions whether or not theirs something funny going on&#8230; What&#8217;s that about??? Can you explain that to me please??? </p>
<p>Then their are those cheaters&#8230;Collusion for one, but also guys who have databases recording every player habbits, strengths en weaknesses. Is it cheating? I don&#8217;t believe it says so in the policy of the sites, but to me it is. </p>
<p>Actually, I can go on for a while, unfortunately. But for me it is clear. I still play online though, but only because it&#8217;s the only place I can play whenever I want since their are not many games in my area. I&#8217;ve made some strict rules for myself for playing online though so I won&#8217;t loose too much money. And you know, It&#8217;s still nice seeing that your AA stays alive about 50% of the time, online that is&#8230;</p>
<p>Koen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yourmum</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2004/11/30/proof-that-online-poker-is-rigged/comment-page-5/#comment-5485</link>
		<dc:creator>yourmum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=190#comment-5485</guid>
		<description>Bill Rini you suck big penis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Rini you suck big penis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
