A tech industry buddy of mine who isn’t really a poker player sent me this article on News.com about a company that is supposedly financing itself via poker playing. My response was:
> > Yeah, I saw that. Sounds a little fishy to me. Others have expressed
> > similar doubts. He’s making $100 – $120 an hour playing “lower
> > stakes”? Since you average about 2BB per hour at limit poker (if
> > you’re *good*), that’s $30/$60 stakes which isn’t “lower stakes” poker
> > unless his bosses happen to be Doyle Brunson and Johnny Chan. :-)
> >
> > Most folks who have seen the story suspect these guys might be playing
> > a little poker on the side but for the most part this is about trying
> > to hitch their wagon to something hot.
It looks like I’m not the only one calling BS on this. TechDirt is questioning their claim as well.
Venture capital may be on the rise again, but it’s still a far cry from the heady dot-com bubble days. So entrepreneurs are relying on more clever ways of funding their startups. For example, one company claims they’ve sustained their company by playing online poker. If true, this would not only be one of the most loco funding stories, but it gives more credence to the idea of a poker bubble, in which everyone and their mother is either playing poker or launching some kind of poker venture. Of course, the story itself has the air of publicity stunt written all over it, like the myth of eBay’s founding as a way to collect Pez dispensers. The idea that you could consistently win as much as these guys are claiming sounds pretty dubious. Maybe they’re just seeking out neophytes, suckers, and drunk Americans at 4:00 AM, but you have to wonder how long that can last. The odds are just not that much in their favor. Regardless, the eBay example shows that a willing press can help propel an interesting story — true or not — to legend status. Even if it turns out to be false years later, oh well. The PR gimmick has already done its job.
For those of you who work in tech, this is an all too common tactic. If Push technology was hot, the marketing people figured out some way to call your product a Push technology product. If Java is hot, you gotta figure out some way to shoehorn in Java. The vast, vast, vast majority of companies who go the chasing the hottest technology route do so because their product sucks. I have to agree with TechDirt that when people start hitching their PR machines to the poker angle, there’s a huge bubble forming. Hopefully, the poker bubble will deflate at a slightly more controlled rate than did the internet bubble.
Related posts:
- PR Web No Longer Accepts Gaming Press Releases Casino City Times is reporting that popular press release...
- Bluffing Into the Nuts Sorry to go all non-poker on you but I...
- 8 Unique Ways To Lose Money In Texas Hold’em by Greg Walker We’ve all been thrashed with the ever popular “10...
- Are Online Gaming Companies Better Than Brick and Mortar Casinos? Lou Krieger recently posted something he didn’t link to...
- Did We Learn Nothing From The Dotcom Boom? I just ran across this article on Bluff about Tell...
| Site | Rackback | Sign Up Bonus | US |
| Absolute Poker | 30% | 150% up to $500 | ![]() |
| Ultimate Bet | 30% | 111% up to $1100 | ![]() |
| Cake Poker | 33% | 110% up to $600 | ![]() |
| PKR Poker | 30% | 100% up to $800 | |
| Paradise Poker | 30% | 200% up to €1,000 | |
| Players Only | 33% | 100% up to $650 | ![]() |
| Fortune Poker | 30% | 200% up to €1,000 | |
| Betfair | 30% | $1500 | |
| Aced | 30% | 100% up to $500 | ![]() |
| Poker Heaven | 30% | 200% up to €1000 | |
| Poker Nordica | 30% | 100% up to $200 | ![]() |
| Carbon Poker | 30% | 150% up to $1000 | ![]() |
| Red Star Poker | 33% | 110% up to $600 | |
| True Poker | 27% | 100% up to $200 | ![]() |
| Action Poker | 35% | 100% up to $2500 | |
| Cellsino Poker | 40% | 500% up to $500 | |
| Minted Poker | 40% | 100% up to $400 | |
| Power Poker | 33% | 110% up to $600 | |
| Interpoker | 30% | 200% up to €1000 | |
| Doyles Room | 33% | 110% up to $600 | |
| Gutshot Poker | 33% | 110% up to $600 | |
| Full Tilt Poker | 27% | 100% up to $600 | ![]() |
| Fat Bet Poker | 40% | 1000% up to €500 | |
| NoiQ Poker | 30% | 100% up to €5000 |
| Site | Rake Race | Rake Chase | Freeroll |
|---|---|---|---|
| Doyle's Room | $35,000 | ||
| Cereus Poker Network* | $7,500 | $10,000 | $10,000** |
| Cake Poker | $60,000 | ||
| Party Poker*** | $50,000 | ||
| Red Star | $23,000 | ||
| Eurobet*** | $21,000 | ||
| Players Only | $16,400 | ||
| Tower Gaming*** | $15,000 | ||
| Full Tilt Poker | $10,000 | ||
| Carbon Poker | $12,000 | ||
| Betfair Poker | $12,000 | ||
| Boss Media Network**** | $5,000 | ||
| Cellsino Poker | $5,000 | ||
| Power Poker | $5,000 | ||
| Poker Nordica | $5,000 | ||
| NoIQ | €1,500 |
* Absolute Poker and Ultimate Bet (UB) ** May not be available to all players *** Poker Heaven, Fortune Poker, InterPoker, Paradise Poker










Hi, my name is Bill Rini and this is my poker blog. I've been blogging about poker and the poker industry since around 2003-ish. Like most people I started out playing poker as entertainment in home games whenever we wanted to sit around and smoke cigars, drink beer, and eat pizza, and needed a good excuse. I started playing online shortly after the first online card rooms opened and it wasn't long before I was playing 20, 30, or even 40 hours a week or more. One day I received a phone call about a program manager position at Tiltware which was the company that consulted to Full Tilt Poker on software development and marketing. After Tiltware I spent about 2.5 years working at Party Poker where I was the poker room manager.
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
I’m curious what the post-bubble poker landscape will look like. Will sites be shut down? Will the player base corrode? I just don’t see it happening any time soon, nor as quickly as the dot.com bubble. But I’m not Nostradamus.
s/corrode/erode/
Nothing says GEEK more than communicating a typo using regex! I love it. I would have gone with:
s/corrode/erode/g