<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Poker Peak Player Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/</link>
	<description>Bill Rini's Poker Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  2 Dec 2008 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/#comment-132770</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/#comment-132770</guid>
		<description>Interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokerdog</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/#comment-132075</link>
		<dc:creator>pokerdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/#comment-132075</guid>
		<description>I really wonder about this, it appears that most recreational US players are finding it a hassle to fund their accounts online. With Neteller not there as an option anymore, lesser sites caterring to the US market, I feel that the growth of online poker might just slow to a halt.

Tribeca pulled out of the US market recently, there's only a few sites that US players can actually play the game that they love so much. I wonder which online poker room will be the next to bow to the pressure and cut off from their US player base.

It looks pretty bleak if you ask me. Of course, it will never completely die off, but with lesser recreational players, the semi-serious players will either get slaughtered by the sharks, or move on to improve and become one of the 8 tabling sharks themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wonder about this, it appears that most recreational US players are finding it a hassle to fund their accounts online. With Neteller not there as an option anymore, lesser sites caterring to the US market, I feel that the growth of online poker might just slow to a halt.</p>
<p>Tribeca pulled out of the US market recently, there&#8217;s only a few sites that US players can actually play the game that they love so much. I wonder which online poker room will be the next to bow to the pressure and cut off from their US player base.</p>
<p>It looks pretty bleak if you ask me. Of course, it will never completely die off, but with lesser recreational players, the semi-serious players will either get slaughtered by the sharks, or move on to improve and become one of the 8 tabling sharks themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/#comment-131689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/#comment-131689</guid>
		<description>Hey F-Train,

Mostly because I consider flat to be negative.  :-)

I say that only in half jest though.  This is an industry that has experienced nothing but growth.  The flatening out of the curve looks good because it seems as if things are stabilizing but my concern is that they're merely holding their ground.  If something doesn't turn around in a major way they're likely to see additional drops.  

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey F-Train,</p>
<p>Mostly because I consider flat to be negative.  <img src='http://www.billrini.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I say that only in half jest though.  This is an industry that has experienced nothing but growth.  The flatening out of the curve looks good because it seems as if things are stabilizing but my concern is that they&#8217;re merely holding their ground.  If something doesn&#8217;t turn around in a major way they&#8217;re likely to see additional drops.  </p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F-Train</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/#comment-131682</link>
		<dc:creator>F-Train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/2007/03/01/online-poker-peak-player-numbers/#comment-131682</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that the numbers are pretty steady for the last 5 weeks (Jan 24-Feb 28). There's no gain, but no loss either.  So while it is accurate to say that Stars is off 24% since Jan 1, it's slightly misleading.

Obviously, a lack of growth doesn't bode well for the industry, but I find it curious that you didn't address the flatness of the slope in the last 5 weeks, preferring instead to characterize it as a negative slope across the full 8 weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that the numbers are pretty steady for the last 5 weeks (Jan 24-Feb 28). There&#8217;s no gain, but no loss either.  So while it is accurate to say that Stars is off 24% since Jan 1, it&#8217;s slightly misleading.</p>
<p>Obviously, a lack of growth doesn&#8217;t bode well for the industry, but I find it curious that you didn&#8217;t address the flatness of the slope in the last 5 weeks, preferring instead to characterize it as a negative slope across the full 8 weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
