Comments on: An Answer to My Critics http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/ Bill Rini's Poker Weblog Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:57:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Bill http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/#comment-136181 Bill Sat, 26 May 2007 01:41:02 +0000 http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/#comment-136181 Dragonystic, 1. How else do you expect me to make a fare comparison? If all those sites took US players and after Oct 13 only a fraction took US players how can I compare the two? I'm looking at the total poker audience available to US players at point A and comparing it to point B. 2. Funny enough you answer your own question in question 3 which means that you were so wound up you started posting without even reading the response. 3. Pick any 3 days pre-Neteller in Jan and do the analysis. I don't give a crap. The difference is going to be in the hundreds, not the thousands. I picked the 1, 2 3rd of Jan as a neutral point. Funny enough, Poker Site Scout comes to the same conclusion. Dragonystic,

1. How else do you expect me to make a fare comparison? If all those sites took US players and after Oct 13 only a fraction took US players how can I compare the two? I’m looking at the total poker audience available to US players at point A and comparing it to point B.

2. Funny enough you answer your own question in question 3 which means that you were so wound up you started posting without even reading the response.

3. Pick any 3 days pre-Neteller in Jan and do the analysis. I don’t give a crap. The difference is going to be in the hundreds, not the thousands. I picked the 1, 2 3rd of Jan as a neutral point. Funny enough, Poker Site Scout comes to the same conclusion.

]]> By: dragonystic http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/#comment-136180 dragonystic Fri, 25 May 2007 19:38:50 +0000 http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/#comment-136180 oh i see, you used Jan 1 2 and 3!!! ROFL What kind of comparison is THAT? January 1st - 7th was the busiest time of the entire year for every single site. (Christmas/New Years come to mind?) A week later the numbers were normal. I can't believe you'd use such a biased set of numbers to do analysis between 2 months. oh i see, you used Jan 1 2 and 3!!! ROFL

What kind of comparison is THAT? January 1st - 7th was the busiest time of the entire year for every single site. (Christmas/New Years come to mind?) A week later the numbers were normal. I can’t believe you’d use such a biased set of numbers to do analysis between 2 months.

]]> By: dragonystic http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/#comment-136179 dragonystic Fri, 25 May 2007 19:24:31 +0000 http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/#comment-136179 also, i have a question, what is the method you used for attaining January's numbers and whath is the method you used for attaining May's numbers. January's look like peaks for the whole month. but you cant have used that for May's numbers, since we're still in May. also, i have a question, what is the method you used for attaining January’s numbers and whath is the method you used for attaining May’s numbers. January’s look like peaks for the whole month. but you cant have used that for May’s numbers, since we’re still in May.

]]> By: dragonystic http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/#comment-136178 dragonystic Fri, 25 May 2007 18:59:23 +0000 http://www.billrini.com/2007/05/25/an-answer-to-my-critics/#comment-136178 did you really use more sites for the preUIGEA #'s, and compare them to a smaller number of sites for postUIGEA? WOW did you really use more sites for the preUIGEA #’s, and compare them to a smaller number of sites for postUIGEA?

WOW

]]>