<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Gaming Conference ICE in London</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billrini.com/2009/01/30/online-gaming-conference-ice-in-london/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billrini.com/2009/01/30/online-gaming-conference-ice-in-london/</link>
	<description>Blogging About Poker Since 2546</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mean Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2009/01/30/online-gaming-conference-ice-in-london/#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator>Mean Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=1666#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>Definitely get the 50mm 1.8 lens. It&#039;s like $90 and takes great shots in low light. Also good as a portrait lens, you get a nice shallow depth of field.

And don&#039;t necessarily go with the 50D because it has more megapixels. More megapixels means you can make larger prints because there&#039;s more data captured, but it also means you might get more noise in your shots (because there&#039;s all those pixels to fill). The 50D I think has some new noise-reduction software to help with that and it shoots up to ISO 12800, though no idea how noisy it gets shooting that high. Still, either camera would be muy sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely get the 50mm 1.8 lens. It&#8217;s like $90 and takes great shots in low light. Also good as a portrait lens, you get a nice shallow depth of field.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t necessarily go with the 50D because it has more megapixels. More megapixels means you can make larger prints because there&#8217;s more data captured, but it also means you might get more noise in your shots (because there&#8217;s all those pixels to fill). The 50D I think has some new noise-reduction software to help with that and it shoots up to ISO 12800, though no idea how noisy it gets shooting that high. Still, either camera would be muy sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

