<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More On Sponsorships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billrini.com/2009/02/02/more-on-sponsorships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billrini.com/2009/02/02/more-on-sponsorships/</link>
	<description>Blogging About Poker Since 2546</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PokerBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2009/02/02/more-on-sponsorships/#comment-2999</link>
		<dc:creator>PokerBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=1686#comment-2999</guid>
		<description>Great take on the situation. Solidify the contracts and clean up the event.

PB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great take on the situation. Solidify the contracts and clean up the event.</p>
<p>PB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Good Poker Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2009/02/02/more-on-sponsorships/#comment-2998</link>
		<dc:creator>The Good Poker Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=1686#comment-2998</guid>
		<description>I agree with a lot of this, and I think you are gonna see some changes in the way that the poker rooms deals with these contracts in the future. It sort of seems like things are moving a little bit more toward player representation at the WSOP...but I remember that they didn&#039;t even show Kelly Kim&#039;s K.O. hand, Im sure his sponsors were not too pleased with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with a lot of this, and I think you are gonna see some changes in the way that the poker rooms deals with these contracts in the future. It sort of seems like things are moving a little bit more toward player representation at the WSOP&#8230;but I remember that they didn&#8217;t even show Kelly Kim&#8217;s K.O. hand, Im sure his sponsors were not too pleased with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2009/02/02/more-on-sponsorships/#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=1686#comment-2995</guid>
		<description>Hey Bill. Any chance you can restore your full RSS feed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bill. Any chance you can restore your full RSS feed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.billrini.com/2009/02/02/more-on-sponsorships/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billrini.com/?p=1686#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>Ladbrokes have changed their WSOP package as a direct result of the Eastgate thing. Now they offer Vegas Holidays, without the main event buy in. They used to send 100+ players to the main event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladbrokes have changed their WSOP package as a direct result of the Eastgate thing. Now they offer Vegas Holidays, without the main event buy in. They used to send 100+ players to the main event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

