Follow me on → Twitter

Blogging About Poker Since 2546    

Play online poker with thousands of real people for FREE
 

Featured Articles



Breaking News at Gambling911

by Bill Rini on January 8, 2010

in Online Poker, Poker, Poker News

man invents fire Breaking News at Gambling911

I hate to bust chops but some things just can’t be overlooked. Recently Gambling911 ran a story titled Online Poker Sites Charge Players For Not Playing in which they claimed that PartyPoker was now charging an inactive fee on accounts where players had not played after six months.

I actually had to go and check the date on the posting to make sure that I wasn’t looking at a very old article. I had to check because when I joined PartyPoker in Sept 2006 they already had this fee in effect. I’m not even sure how long before that they instituted the fee but that fee has been there quite a long time.

In fact, I typed “partygaming +inactive +fee” into Google and I received a result going back to 2006 (Hollywood Poker Lounge) plus several mentions in Sept 2009. Unfortunately, I ran out of energy to find the exact date they implemented the fee but that thread going back to 2006 mentions that the fee has been in place for awhile. In fact, the original post is dated Nov 1, 2006 and he says he was told they were taking the fee which means he was inactive for at least 6 months prior to that so the latest the fees could have gone into effect was May of 2006. However if memory serves me correctly the fees were in place a lot earlier than that.

inactive fees Breaking News at Gambling911

So Patrick Flanigan of Gambling911.com, just because you read it on 2+2 doesn’t make it current news. Every time Party imposes the fee some chucklehead goes onto the message boards and claims Party is stealing from him. And the same peanut gallery of newbies acts surprised and vows to file a multi-kazillion dollar lawsuit to prevent Party from taking .03 from their account.

Related Posts

Updates Emailed to You Hot Off the Press

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Short-Stacked Shamus January 8, 2010 at 2:20 pm

I too recall getting hit with this inactivity fee — not long after Party left the U.S. in 10/06 & as an American I was no longer able to play there. Kind of enjoyed the absurdity of it at the time, if I recall.

We Yanks must all owe hundreds there now. G911 should investigate. :)

2 Bill Rini January 9, 2010 at 12:44 am

What other headlines could Gambling911 come up with?

PLAYERS THINK ONLINE POKER RIGGED!!!!!!

3 Tim January 9, 2010 at 3:13 pm

Kinda sucks when you go and play on Party to avoid the fee and end up losing more than the fee itself. That’s what happened to me :)

4 stoixima January 10, 2010 at 6:02 pm

It’s like charging a junkie for being clear for three months. Is there even one in a thousand that do this for six months??????

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: